Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
11
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
France Is Banning Plastic Forks, Causing The Disposable Junk Industry To Panic[2016/09/28]
-
Toyota’s product plan reportedly includes several small models, including a compact SUV, likely targeting a range greater than 215 miles and built on the Toyota New Global Architecture (TNGA) platform[2016/11/12]
-
Batterty Energy Tech In Paradise [2016/11/18]
-
How to stop your smartphone battery from exploding[2016/09/30]
-
BLOG For want of a better battery: Bob McDonald[2016/10/15]
-
Warming to lithium-ion, Toyota charges up its battery options[2016/10/31]
-
?Samsung apologizes to Galaxy Note 7 customers[2016/11/09]
-
Should you fear your phone battery?[2016/10/13]
-
Airline ban on Samsung Galaxy Note 7 widens as concern grows about fire risk[2016/10/17]
-
Bendable Battery May Power Future Wearable Devices, Smartphones[2016/10/19]
-
How Scientists Turned Junkyard Scrap Metal Into A Battery[2016/11/08]
-
Mopie Powerstation Review: A Smartphone's Secret To All-Day Battery Life[2016/09/26]